There’s No App For That

October 23, 2015

My large corporate clients follow the “take no prisoners” strategy in protecting their trademarks while my small clients register each of their marks as soon as they are placed into commerce, if not before, using the “intent to use” option under the trademark statute.  I once told a client, half-jokingly, that when it comes to protecting your intellectual property, “there’s no app for that.”  He replied, “That’s a good tag line.  Are you going to register that?”  Without missing a beat, I replied “Only after doing a trademark search.”

Following my own advice, I did a trademark search for the tag line “There’s no app for that,” filed my trademark application, and sure enough, my diligence resulted in a registered trademark. What was originally just a play-on-words that came to me while giving trademark advice to someone else is now intellectual property owned by Firm.  Alanis Morissett’s lyric “Isn’t it ironic?” comes to mind.

But wait.  There’s more to this story.  I also teach my clients to “marry their marks” when they can.  If you own two marks separately, and are using them together, I tell my clients to register them together for optimal protection.  Taking my own advice, I applied for an additional trademark that combined my trademark “Trials.  Experience.  Strategy.” with my new mark “There’s no app for that.”  By marrying two separate marks, my old mark took on a new meaning and sent a new message to existing and future clients:  “Trials.  Experience.  Strategy.  There’s no app for that.

Here is my point.  Intellectual property truly is the property of your intellect.  Protect it.  Diligently.  Large clients were once small startup companies founded by an entrepreneur who had a good idea for a new product or service, protected the idea, and eventually took it to market.  That’s how they became “big clients.”  It sounds simple but it’s hard work.  To quote Edison, “Success is 10% inspiration and 90% perspiration.”  Hard work – there’s no app for that, either.

Recent Posts

Kennedy Law Wins Final Judgment for $6.5 Million

DALLAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dallas-based law firm Kennedy Law, P.C. announced that it won a final judgment for $6.5 million for Commerce Street Capital against First United Bank & Trust Company and Durant Bank Corp. for breaching an investment banking agreement. The...

Hate Speech, The Sequel

On July 20, 2017, I posted a blog entitled Hate Speech Online. That blog recounted the disastrous consequences that one potential client endured after posting a hateful statement on Twitter. A third party that the potential client did not know re-posted the tweet for...

Should I Sign an NDA with My Employees?

There are a number of different situations in which you, the employer, may find it necessary to sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) with your employees. You want to develop trust with your employees, but you also want to be sure your business information is...